Now there is a pernicious and pervasive way of thinking which looks for conspiracy everywhere.
Mutterings and secret plans, 1604 |
All that is needed is an event which someone will seek to deny, or bend to their own political purposes.
And we are all familiar with the assertion that the Covid virus was not real, but when challenged with the evidence, advocates often switch tack and argue that it is in the interests of “them” to manufacture the scare, thereby to increase the powers of State surveillance, or manipulate the international markets.
Attempting to refute them is like counting the grains of sand in a bucket or pushing water up hill.
More recently I have followed the line of that radical 18th century writer Thomas Paine who wrote “To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, ….. is like administering medicine to the dead”.
It a powerful guide to how to treat the outlandish arguments of those who have travelled beyond the borders of reason and reminds me of Deborah Lipstadt’s often referenced explanation for why she doesn’t debate with Holocaust Deniers because it is as pointless as discussing with “flat-Earthers or the Elvis-is-alive people”.*
All of that said there is a fine line between conspiracy theories and reinterpretations of past events. **
And as this is November 5th it neatly leads into the failed Gunpowder Plot, that awful act of planned terrorism which was so horrendous that its failure continues to be celebrated every year since Robert Catesby, Guy Fawkes and the other conspirators were caught and executed.
In recent years the celebrations have been eclipsed by Halloween, so while the fireworks will burst on either side of November 5th and continue like a damp squib for perhaps a week few kids now take to the street asking for “a penny for the Guy” and heaps will not even know the historical significance of burning the guy and setting off fireworks.
Plotting the unthinkable 1604 |
So far so good, but it failed.
The ringleaders were captured, tried, and executed and things got a lot worse for Catholics.
But even at the time some questioned elements of the plot, citing the King’s chief advisor as implicated in a “set up”.
Conspiracies and disasters, 1970s |
All of which offered some of us a fine set of history lessons where we presented the traditional account, offered up suspected flaws and led our year 8 history students to draw their own conclusions.
In 1996 the historian Antonia Fraser presented her interpretation which while it accepted that there was a plot challenged bits of the narrative. ***
And over the next few days I shall revisit her book, reading it as the last fireworks burst into the night and reflect that while there are and have always been real conspiracies, the default line of many is to see conspiracies where they don’t exist, and trade on assertions and half-truths.
Pictures; a contemporary drawing of the Gunpowder Plot Conspirators, Crispijn van de Passe the Elder, and a popular badge from the 1970s
Guy Fawkes, Catesby and Winter, 1604 |
*Thomas Paine US History, https://www.ushistory.org/paine/crisis/c-05.htm
**“administering medicine to the dead” ……. The American War of Independence ..... and Thomas Paine, https://chorltonhistory.blogspot.com/2021/11/administering-medicine-to-dead-american.html
*** The Gunpowder Plot, Terror & Faith in 1605, Antonia Fraser, 1996
No comments:
Post a Comment