Looking for our memorial to Manchester’s Cholera deaths

Now I may well have missed it, but I don’t think we have a memorial to those who perished in the great Cholera outbreak of 1832.

The Cholera Monument, Sheffield, 2006

And I say that because today I came across Sheffield’s monument to its Cholera victims, which stands just a bit west of the railway station, situated in grounds that were laid out in 1850, fifteen years after the monument was completed and seventeen years after the epidemic which killed 402 people.

402 victims of the disease were buried in grounds between Park Hill and Norfolk Park adjoining Clay Wood. Money from the treasurers of the Board of Health was set aside for a monument for the site.

Cholera was regarded by many as the worst of the killer diseases that swept through our towns and cities in the 19th century.

It was often referred to as “Deadly” or “King Cholera” and is an infection caused by contaminated food and water.

The main symptoms are diarrhea and vomiting, and if untreated will continue until the patient becomes severely dehydrated. In the final stages a cholera victim will bring up what was called rice water and is almost clear liquid with fishy smell and resemble living skeletons.

Its impact was always going to be worst in the overcrowded and unsanitary parts of the city where large numbers were crowded together in back to back housing and narrow enclosed courts.

New Wakefield Street, 2004

There are vivid descriptions of these places in the 1840s by writers like Frederick Engels, Leon Faucher and Dr Kay, as well as official reports.

The Report of the General Board of Health on the Epidemic Cholera of 1848 & 1849, drew attention to the fact that in the Market Street district of Manchester half the cases of Cholera were from the inhabitants of courts and cellar dwellings, which were in close proximity to open privies where the water supply was of a “poor quality” often served several cottages and was generally only “turned on for an hour day”.

More revealing is the case notes of Dr Henry Gaulter who experienced the first outbreak of Cholera during the May to December of 1832. He kept a detailed record of the first three hundred patients he attended describing their physical condition, the onset of the disease and their living conditions but was forced to abandon the exercise as the numbers increased.

Little Ireland, 1844

 Here is the fit, not so fit and in many cases undernourished residents of streets which were overcrowded and dirty, like Martha Chorlton aged 57 of 10 John Street Ancoats, who lived in a “locality, crowding, filth, &c. Street in a very populous and poor neighbourhood.” *

Or Thomas Cavanagh aged 5 and his mother Elizabeth who lived at 5 Wakefield-street Little Ireland which “fronted an open area but an impure stream whose channel does the function of a sewer, passes by the door to adjoining field where it collects and stagnates: house and inhabitants very filthy: three children and two adults on a straw bed.”

And so, it goes on but not all the streets were dirty and not all those who would contract the disease were poor.

The rich had servants who may have had relatives in the more depressed parts of the city and might walk the disease in by the servant’s entrance.

Span Court, 1965

Nor should we forget that the wealthy often lived near run down areas. So that very posh set of late 18th century houses on St John Street off Deansgate was just next door to Span Court and surrounded by roads where there was overcrowding and Cholera.

Perhaps also we should be careful not to overstate the impact of the disease on the city.

There were just over 142,000 people in the city of which according to Gaulter 1,325 died.  But then there is the danger of falling into that callous numbers game which judges deaths in terms of statistics while for the individual just one death is a tragedy.

And the chances were that for those who contracted it death was a pretty strong outcome. So, for those who caught Cholera in Manchester over 50% would die while in Chorlton on Medlock the figure was 38% and in Salford 30%. These are not odds that I would fancy.

Nor I think should we feel that it was just the cities and towns that suffered. Rural areas were equally unsanitary and diseases like typhus and typhoid were according to the Poor Law Commissioners real threats in the countryside.

So where are Manchester’s memorials.?  I can think of the inscription on the foot of the cross in St John’s Gardens, and the plaque in St Michael’s Fields in Angel Meadow, but I am stumped as to a specific Cholera one.

That said I bet there is, and someone will tell me.

I hope so.

Picture; Cholera Monument, Sheffield, Gregory Deryckère, 2006,** New Wakefield Street, Little Ireland 2004, from the collection of Andrew Simpson,Little Ireland, 1844, from the OS of Manchester & Salford, 1844, courtesy of Digital Archives Association, http://digitalarchives.co.uk/  and Span Court, south side of Artillery Street, J. Ryder, 1965 m00211, courtesy of Manchester Libraries, Information and Archives, Manchester City Council, http://images.manchester.gov.uk/index.php?session=pass 

 *Gaulter Henry, The Origin and Progress of the Malignant Cholera, 1833, London, & Appendix A, To the Report of the General Board of Health on the Epidemic Cholera of 1848 & 1849, 1850, London

**Gregory Deryckère, permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation